|
![]() |
Title 14. Chapter 3. Guidelines
for Implementation of the Article 15. Litigation Sections 15230 to 15233 15230. Time Limits and Criteria Litigation under CEQA must be
handled under the time limits and criteria described in Sections 21167 et seq.
of the Public Resources Code and Section 15112 of these Guidelines in addition
to provisions in this article. Note: Authority
cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code; Reference: Sections 21167 et seq., Public Resources Code. Discussion: This
section provides a cross-reference to the statutory sections which govern
litigation under CEQA. 15231. Adequacy of A final (a) The (b) A subsequent Note: Authority
cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code; Reference: Sections 21080.1,
21166, 21167.2, and 21167.3, Public Resources Code. Discussion: This
section is added to clarify the ways in which a Responsible Agency is affected
by litigation involving the adequacy of environmental documents prepared by the
Lead Agency. This section implements CEQA Section 21167.2 but provides
additional interpretation. This Guideline section limits the conclusive
presumption that an 15232. Request for Hearing In a writ of mandate proceeding
challenging approval of a project under CEQA, the petitioner shall, within 90
days of filing the petition, request a hearing or otherwise be subject to
dismissal on the court's own motion or on the motion of any party to the suit. Note: Authority
cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code; Reference: Section 21167.4, Public
Resources Code. Discussion: Experience
with Section 21167.4 of CEQA has revealed an ambiguity that needs
interpretation in the Guidelines. Section 21167.4 provides in part: ". . .
the petitioner shall request a hearing within 90 days of filing the petition or
otherwise be subject to dismissal. . . ." The section does not make it
clear whether only the request must be made within 90 days after filing the
petition, or whether the hearing must be had within 90 days. 15233. Conditional Permits If a lawsuit is filed
challenging an (a) If an injunction or a
stay has been granted in the lawsuit prohibiting the project from being carried
out, the Responsible Agency shall have authority only to disapprove the project
or to grant a conditional approval of the project. A conditional approval shall
constitute permission to proceed with a project only when the court action
results in a final determination that the (b) If no injunction or stay
is granted in the lawsuit, the Responsible Agency shall assume that the Note: Authority
cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code; Reference: Section 21167.3, Public
Resources Code; Kriebel v. City Council (1980) 112 Discussion: This
section combines the statutory provision dealing with conditional permits with
administrative interpretations. While the statute limits the authority of the
Responsible Agency to granting a conditional approval for a project, this
Guideline section follows case law by providing authority to disapprove the
application as well. Document URL: http://ceres.ca.gov/topic/env_law/ceqa/guidelines/art15.html Copyright © 1998-2003 California Resources Agency. All rights reserved. |