The Mammoth-June Case Study

THE LAKE TAHOE CASE STUDY

The Mediated Settlement Case Study

Ecosystems Under Four Different Institutions

Concluding Notes on the Case Studies

CURRENT PAGE:
7 of 22

With a long, science-based history of environmental assessment, property acquisition, restoration. and management, the Lake Tahoe Basin (LTB) provides much information on the role of adaptive management policies in an altered ecosystem. Though it is not a strict parallel for other parts of the Sierra, the knowledge and experience of ecosystem governance may be greater in the LTB than at any other locale in the Sierra or the United States. The experience shows promise largely because decisions are based on the best available ecosystem information and because a broad spectrum of public and private entities have participated.

1. How does this case study demonstrate an approach to defining and understanding an ecosystem?

Ecosystems are complex, difficult to define, and have unclear boundaries. Thus, it is difficult to focus on interrelationships between elements and management needs. Efforts to understand and define the ecosystem of the LTB have been fueled by concentrating on a valued attribute of the ecosystemthe exceptional clarity of the waters of Lake Tahoe. That it is a relatively small watershed and that the boundaries of the ecosystem and basin are the same aided the effort. Although external influences (e.g., air quality) impact the basin, the small scale of the ecosystem aided in understanding the structure and function of its constituent parts. It was also made possible by the availability of three decades of water-quality dataone of the most significant data sets of its kind in the world.
The initial focus on water clarity has motivated efforts to broaden the understanding of the relationship to water quality of wetlands, soils and vegetation, and deposition of nutrients from the air. Water and nutrient flows off the watershed into the lake were understood, early on, to cause decreased lake clarity. A system to classify the lands capability to withstand disturbance was developed in the 1960s. Recently, research has been undertaken to identify the role of atmospheric deposition of nutrients and the biotic structure of organisms within the lake. Wildlife considerations have also been integrated into this system of evaluation.
Recently, there has been increasing focus on the health of the forests in the ecosystem. Between 25% and 40% of the trees in the LTB are dead or dying. This focus is being spurred on by the threat of catastrophic fire and degradation of scenic values in the region. This effort will result in a better sense of terrestrial vegetative and hydrologic processes.
Ideally, our approach to ecosystem management should be based on an overview understanding of the structure and function of all parts of the ecosystem. However, this type of effort will require the commitment of a substantial amount of resources over a long period of time. The Lake Tahoe experience shows how this endeavor can be sustained by focusing on a valued attribute that, in turn, will at least partially illuminate, or provide the basis for dealing with, the structure and function of the ecosystem as a whole. The key to valuing the ecosystem is educating one another on the values that exist to some degree in all ecosystems.

2. What role does long-term information play in understanding and managing this ecosystem?

Knowing the rate of LTB ecosystem change places the problem in temporal perspective and assigns the issue an appropriate level of importance. For example, a scientist working with the Tahoe Research Group recently stated (verbally, to the SNEP assessment team) that, in the absence of humans and nutrient introduction from large volcanoes, Lake Tahoe would have taken approximately 400,000 years (from the end of the Pleistocene) to progress to the level of diminished clarity currently found. Thus, the 10,000 years of human occupation have seen the lake progress to a state that normally would have taken roughly forty times longer. (If only the last 150 years of human occupation are considered, the ratio is even more striking.) Though this is an estimate based on a general, but quite substantial, knowledge of lake eutrophication, it places the magnitude of the problem in perspective, assigning a high level of importance to investment in restoration and management.
The past thirty-five years have seen the establishment of an unprecedented water-quality database. Water clarity and related indicators have been monitored by the Tahoe Research Group, creating a continuous record of data that is unparalleled in the Sierra. In addition to its value as a record of water quality, the database enables researchers to evaluate other variables with respect to a single, widely accepted indicator. Thus, issues as diverse as construction, forest management, and erosion control practices may be evaluated, in part, with respect to their impact on water quality. The long term of the database helps establish a relatively high degree of accuracy.
Certain types of historical information, such as water quality and fire interval data, have provided specific guidance about managing the LTB ecosystem. Other types of data may not provide specific guidance but help achieve the understanding of changing ecosystem structure and function that forms the basis for long-term policy and target standards. Historical information also helps isolate the roles of nature and humans, distinguishing between what is under our control and what is not.
Is historical knowledge adequate for ecosystem management of the Lake Tahoe Basin? Clearly there is a need for additional data. For example, more data are needed to develop a comprehensive nutrient budget for Lake Tahoe. Little is known about the basins forest prior to the arrival of Native American peoples. Similarly, the incidence of fire in prehistoric times is not well understood. Nevertheless, the existing, widely acknowledged record, particularly that of the past thirty-five years, provides a basis for ecosystem management that is scientifically based.