
Critical Findings
ASSESSMENT
* A Past View of Resources in the Lahontan Region
* Deer Creek Watershed Conservancy
* Watershed Risk Assessment
* Mercury Contamination
Strategies for Improving Watersheds and Aquatic Biodiversity
CURRENT PAGE:
5 of 11

|
|
Recovery and Restoration
Although few changes other than extinction are irreversible in an absolute sense,
many environmental modifications can be considered to be effectively irreversible.
Most structures, such as large dams, canals, residential developments, and highways,
are permanent for practical purposes. However, impacts from permanent structures can often
be reduced by changes in use of the structures or by creative mitigation. Other persistent
impacts, such as unsurfaced forest roads and agricultural fields, can be removed or mitigated, and ecological functions of the site can be restored with sufficient
investment. Cessation of chronic disturbances, such as grazing or trampling in riparian
areas, seasonal water diversions, and stocking of nonreproducing fish, will allow
natural recovery of different aspects of an ecosystem at varying rates. For example,
wet meadows converted to dry terraces above an incised stream as a result of overgrazing
may not recover even over a century without active restoration work. Riparian vegetation tends to become reestablished within a few years after chronic disturbance is
eliminated, but readjustment of channel morphology to a natural shape may require
decades. Although disturbances such as a single timber harvest or a fire can have
severe short-term effects, natural recovery from them generally occurs at a much faster rate
than recovery from chronic disturbances.
Knowledge Base
The knowledge base for improving water allocation and implementing sound watershed
management in the Sierra Nevada is notably weak. Economic values of water in different
uses are not well established. Information about water demand and historic water
rights is not easily accessible. Records of water quality and sediment yield are available
at very few sites throughout the mountain range. Rates of natural and accelerated
erosion have not been measured at many locations in the Sierra Nevada. The impacts
of various water and land-management practices are not quantified or even known in some
cases. In the few cases where long-term, rangewide surveys exist, such as grazing
transects in wet meadows on the national forests, data have not been summarized until
now. The effectiveness of best management practices and restoration techniques are largely
untested. In general, the basic data for sound decision making about improving water
and watershed management are lacking. Specific habitat requirements of most riparian-dependent terrestrial vertebrate species are poorly documented, and general surveys
of species distribution for most aquatic invertebrate species are missing. Adequate
monitoring of natural processes, impacts, mitigation, and restoration could provide
a much better basis for water resources planning and administration. Inadequate information
is currently a major constraint on improvements in water and land management.
In summary, the aquatic/riparian systems are the most altered and impaired habitats
of the Sierra. Species losses and changes in species assemblages have been accelerated
in aquatic and aquatic-connected habitats. Frogs, in particular, have been declining
at an alarming rate in recent years. Native fish and other assemblages have been fragmented
by water projects. Many aquatic species are either listed as threatened or endangered
or will be candidates for listing if present trends continue. The declines were especially severe during the first hundred years of water development, starting
with hydraulic mining. Although declines have subsequently slowed in most cases,
many continue and there is little evidence of long-term improvement in the status
of aquatic organisms.
Restoration, better management, and research are needed to recover lost habitat, prevent
further loss, and monitor efficacy of management. Suggested solutions are outlined
in the strategies and in the individual assessments of volume II.

|