|
* Critical Findings * Logging in the Sierra Nevada MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES * Implementing SNEP Forest Strategies
CURRENT PAGE: |
|
MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
Of the six strategies SNEP analyzed to counter the major declines in late successional
forests that were found during the SNEP assessments, three are presented here. Each
assumes that existing high-quality late successional forests must be retained and
expanded to support the full range of organisms and functions into the future. In concept
the strategies illustrate contrasting opportunities in a continuum of landscape designs
to achieve similar goals. Although the strategies target different forest types or areas, the designs they use, as well as other combinations suggested by them, could
apply to other forest types in the Sierra. Here, as elsewhere in SNEP, we emphasize
that actual solutions will depend on analysis of local conditions; the key when going
to the ground is to adapt a Sierra-wide framework to local needs. We suggest here
the framework of thinking as well as a range of options possible for maintaining
and enhancing late successional forest representation at the Sierra-wide scale. Goals of Late Successional Forest Strategies
A recurring question in the development of forest condition strategies is whether
provision of large blocks of contiguous late successional forest (several thousands
of acres) is critical or whether necessary conditions can be provided with smaller
blocks (less than a few hundred acres). Although there are ecological and practical arguments
for both, it is clear that large areas of late successional forest were the aboriginal
condition. These areas were complex, fine-scale mosaics of varied stand structures, including areas of high and low density, and patches with young and mixed-age trees.
Thus, large blocks of late successional forest include many seral stages and structurally
diverse patches. Because aboriginal late successional forests tended to be so varied, the ecological value of large, continuous undisturbed areas or reserves is
less clear than in areas where homogeneous landscape is a natural condition. In the
Sierra there is little scientific consensus on this issue, although it is clearer
that disruption by roads, mechanical entry, harvest, or grazing reduces the habitat quality
and function for some species.
![]()
|